## You are here

Homewinding number

## Primary tabs

# winding number

Winding numbers are a basic notion in algebraic topology, and play an important role in connection with analytic functions of a complex variable. Intuitively, given a closed curve $t\mapsto S(t)$ in an oriented Euclidean plane (such as the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$), and a point $p$ not in the image of $S$, the winding number (or index) of $S$ with respect to $p$ is the net number of times $S$ surrounds $p$. It is not altogether easy to make this notion rigorous.

Let us take $\mathbb{C}$ for the plane. We have a continuous mapping $S:[a,b]\to\mathbb{C}$ where $a$ and $b$ are some reals with $a<b$ and $S(a)=S(b)$. Denote by $\theta(t)$ the angle from the positive real axis to the ray from $z_{0}$ to $S(t)$. As $t$ moves from $a$ to $b$, we expect $\theta$ to increase or decrease by a multiple of $2\pi$, namely $2\omega\pi$ where $\omega$ is the winding number. One therefore thinks of using integration. And indeed, in the theory of functions of a complex variable, it is proved that the value

$\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{S}\frac{dz}{z-z_{0}}$ |

is an integer and has the expected properties of a winding number around $z_{0}$. To define the winding number in this way, we need to assume that the closed path $S$ is rectifiable (so that the path integral is defined). An equivalent condition is that the real and imaginary parts of the function $S$ are of bounded variation.

But if $S$ is any continuous mapping $[a,b]\to\mathbb{C}$ having $S(a)=S(b)$, the winding number is still definable, without any integration. We can break up the domain of $S$ into a finite number of intervals such that the image of $S$, on any of those intervals, is contained in a disc which does not contain $z_{0}$. Then $2\omega\pi$ emerges as a finite sum: the sum of the angles subtended at $z_{0}$ by the sides of a polygon.

Let $A$, $B$, and $C$ be any three distinct rays from $z_{0}$. The three sets

$S^{{-1}}(A)\qquad S^{{-1}}(B)\qquad S^{{-1}}(C)$ |

are closed in $[a,b]$, and they *determine*
the winding number of $S$ around $z_{0}$. This result can provide an alternative
definition of winding numbers in $\mathbb{C}$, and a definition in some other
spaces also, but the details are rather subtle.

For one more variation on the theme, let $S$ be any topological space homeomorphic to a circle, and let $f:S\to S$ be any continuous mapping. Intuitively we expect that if a point $x$ travels once around $S$, the point $f(x)$ will travel around $S$ some integral number of times, say $n$ times. The notion can be made precise. Moreover, the number $n$ is determined by the three closed sets

$f^{{-1}}(a)\qquad f^{{-1}}(b)\qquad f^{{-1}}(c)$ |

where $a$, $b$, and $c$ are any three distinct points in $S$.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

55M25*no label found*30A99

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff
- Corrections

## Comments

## winding number

is there an algorithmic way to define a winding number and relate it to line integral as defined in complex analysis. it should wotk even if the index is any integer

## Re: winding number

the number w(c)=(1/(2\pi i))\int_c(1/z)dz counts the turns that the curve c gives around the origin. Try c(t)=exp(2 i n \pi t) to see sample